Report of the Water Quality Committee

 

July 8, 2010

 

 

In an effort to improve water quality, and particularly water clarity, and reduce the amount of algae, we have learned some things, but still have much further to go.

 

1.     With aid from the U of Maine laboratory in Orono, we had them analyze for the pesticides normally used on blueberries—Velpar, Terbacil, and Propiconazole.  They found no (at one location), or only traces (at two locations), of Velpar, barely above the limit of detection.  Even assuming that a person consumed all of their water from the pond (unwise!) the margin of safety would be huge—approximately a million.

 

2.  We sampled at the shoreline from six locations shown on the map.  It appears we should in the future add a seventh location, the deepest area in the pond.  That is the area of greatest concern because that is where the “dead zone” is located, the deeper level where there is no dissolved oxygen.  This is the only location used by the DEP when analyzing the lake, and may often be the only location we will use in the future.

 

3.a.  Nitrate and phosphorus are below the limits of detection by the methods we used. These were good quality analysis kits from a reputable manufacturer and recommended for this purpose.  Both levels however, and especially that of phosphorus, even though not detectable by these methods, are apparently still high enough to permit algal growth.

 

b.  Our next step in analysis will be to look for a more sensitive kit for    phosphorus, (and its cost) and to explore with two water quality labs the cost of one analysis for phosphorus.

 

c.  Because a common source of phosphorus contamination is run-off from dirt and gravel roads, we will be checking road conditions around the pond, and perhaps doing sampling for phosphorus from those locations.

 

4.     We sampled for detergent at all locations and found none detectable by a method sensitive to at least 0.1 parts per million.

 

5.     We will need to borrow or improvise a kit for sampling dissolved oxygen and temperature at various depths from the deepest part of the pond.  State analyses over the years have shown a dead zone (totally lacking in oxygen) in the deepest part.  This is the result of decay of algae and other plant life on the bottom.  We will also look into borrowing, or (only with approval) buying, a more expensive, but far more convenient means for measuring dissolved oxygen.

 

6.     We will be contacting the state and several commercial laboratories to determine the cost of running microbiological samples.

 

7.     We will use the Secchi disk method for measuring water clarity at the deepest point, and report on the results.

 

8.     We will be contacting a person knowledgeable about water quality issues in Maine to see whom she could recommend to advise us on desirable next steps.  Among other possible steps would be doing counts of phytoplankton (such as algae) and zooplankton (tiny animals that eat algae).

 

Brian Friedmann, Dick Hall, Joe Jordan, Dana Shaw